Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Beard's avatar

Well said. I think this is especially true because of how contingent or even random career success and hiring can be. Many people have a story of "oh I happened to meet this person at this book club, which led to an opportunity" or "oh I ran into them at a conference and we started collaborating." One conclusion from this is to 'increase your surface area for luck,' but another is to realize that everyone else is in this situation, so one __ <> __ connection email might change their life. Talent markets are extremely inefficient.

And it's often not that costly. Tyler Cowen discusses how high return it is to raise people's ambitions compared to the effort it takes - but I think this is also true of introductions, sharing opportunities or papers others might not be aware of, etc. Yes you need good taste and it takes time to develop a map of a field, but it's so underrated compared to directly chipping away at a problem.

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/10/high-return-activity-raising-others-aspirations.html

Chris Lakin's avatar

- matchmaking friends, keeping a database of people you know and what they want or want to give. eg I have a list of all of the "collective intelligence people" I know

- helping searchers (eg people who are hiring) write better tweets

- tweeting for friends hiring who don't tweet https://x.com/chrislakin/status/2060885569904001265

- pointing out when friends seem dissatisfied with their current role

- telling people who should know about grant opportunities fellowships etc but don't

- connecting startups to funding

there's a little part of my brain that fires every time I see a thing (eg, a tweet). It's like "Who does this remind me of? Who is looking for this?" I send tweets and links to other people several times a week, sometimes it was just like something we spoke about once four years ago.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?